

NEW EPA DOCUMENTS AND NEW PERMITS RELEASED
HERE ARE THE DOCUMENTS

READ THE EPA FULL REPORT HERE:ย ย EPA HILLSBORO REPORT ON INTEL
I have read the report and welcome debate and expansion by those who take the time to read it. Please weigh in the Commernts section below.
Page 16-29 from the Report: “A lack of transparency in Intelโs potential-to-emit and actual emissions calculations mean that the facility-wide permit limits intended to limit hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) to below major source thresholds are not enforceable as a practical matter.“
Take that in for a minuteโthe EPA from Denver, Colorado, came to Hillsboro, Oregon, did a surprise visit, checked all the equipment that creates Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPS), and found enough wrong to make a statement like that.
What does that statement mean?ย ย I interpret it as Intel claiming that they are not polluting enough to be required to obtain the lengthy, expensive, and highly monitored Major Source Permit.ย The EPA is finding enough wrong to state on the record that the permit Intel has is garbage because the company is not properly reporting and is unreliable in its actual emissions records.ย They are probably hiding things, and should they properly report, will likely have to get new permits and be subjected to much more stringent guidelines.
See below:

Another grave concern in the report is that in multiple places the report takes issue with Intel’s reporting of the percentage of equipment utilization in the Fabs. Intel reported that their boilers were operating at 30% utilization. At the same time, Intel representatives said they do not intend to be required to keep the boilers at 30% or lower in their permits. Look at the excerpt below and the red section underlined.
From The Report:ย Description of Observation: On July 7, 2023, Intel submitted a Prevention of Significant (PSD)
major modification permit application to EPA Region 10 and the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (OR DEQ) for its Aloha and Ronler Acres facility. Included with the
application were potential-to-emit (PTE) calculations for all the emission units at the facility.
NEIC reviewed the PTE calculations for the boilers and observed that the PTE calculations
included a utilization rate factor of 30% (Appendix I โ Contains Company-claimed CBI).
During the inspection, Intel representatives stated that they do not intend for the 30%
utilization rate factor to be included as a permit limit. Because the boiler utilization rate
factor restricts the PTE of the facility, EPA would expect such a limitation be included in a
permit.
NEIC calculated the boiler PTE without using the 30% utilization rate factor (i.e., using a 100%
utilization rate factor), which resulted in a PTE of 0.5 tons per year (tpy) for total HAPs and
0.14 tpy for toluene, the greatest individual HAP (Appendix K). While these values are small,
the Intel facility PTE emissions for HAPs are close to the major source threshold, and
emissions from the boilers have the potential to impact the facilityโs source status under the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutant (NESHAP) standards.
Intel is very close to triggering a Major Source Permit, which is a big deal because a Major Source Permit will trigger a Title V Permit.
“Title V of the 1990 Federal Clean Air Act requires each state to develop a comprehensive operating permit program for major industrial sources of air pollution. The program clarifies the environmental obligations of a business by organizing in one document all of a business’ air pollution control requirements.
The Title V Operating Permit Program does not require any tighter emissions standards; it does, however, place a greater responsibility on the business for monitoring, reporting, and certifying compliance with the conditions of the permit.”ย Oregon DEQ
Subject: Public comment, EQC, May 23, 2024, Dale Feik – written and oral
To:ย ย Environmental Quality Commissioners via Lindsay Trapp (Please forward
this email to the four Commissioners – Kathleen George, Chair – and
Vice-chair Sam Baraso, and Commissioners, Amy Schlusser, Mark Webb; and DEQ
Director Leah FeldonTo:ย To Governor Kotek.ย You have authorized at least 90 million dollars to
Intel.ย Please make sure that the DEQ has the money/staff to do the
extensive work to analyze the huge amount of data to be able to verify
Intel’s calculations related to Source Review of Intel’s approved Air
Contaminant Discharge Permit.Re:ย Public comment for the EQC, May 23, 2024, meeting, by Dale Feik — RE:
Intel, EPA NEIC inspection, Intel’s reply and DEQ requirement in approved
Air PermitAbout seven years ago, I requested that EPA conduct an unannounced
inspection of Intel’s operations in Washington County by the Office of
Enforcement and Compliance Assurance office in Denver, Colorado.ย ย A
four-day inspection was done July 17-20, 2023, and a report titled “NEIC
CIVIL INVESTIGATION REPORT at Intel Aloha and Ronler Acres Campuses, July
17-20, 2023, was written and sent to the EPA Region Office in Seattle
September 15, 2023.Thomas Wood, an air permit attorney hired by Intel, wrote a seven-page
letter dated October 25, 2023, questioning some of the EPA observations made
in the report. Wood questioned how National Emissions Standards of Hazardous
Air Pollutants (NESHAP) are calculated.ย Intel claims that they do not need
to be regulated by NESHAP standards – a standard that would require Intel to
be an EPA Federal Major Source of Emission facility and therefore held to a
higher standard which would require more effective control devices.In the NEIC report on page 16 under the heading Observation 1, it states-
“Contains Company-claimed Confidential Business Information.ย Observation
summary:ย A lack of transparency in Intel’s potential-to-emit and actual
emission calculations mean that the facility-wide permit limits intended to
limit hazardous air pollutants (HAPS) to below major source thresholds are
not enforceable as a practical matter.”Observation 1 was written before DEQ issued to Intel its Air Contaminate
Discharge Permit dated April 16, 2024.ย Because of the lack of transparency
issue, DEQ required in the approved air permit that Intel pay for Annual
Source Testing of all their wet scrubbers.ย Then DEQ will do Annual Reviews
of those results.Sincerely,
Dale Feik
Chair, Washington County Citizen Action Network (WC CAN) –
http://www.wc-can.org/
Cell:ย 503-504-5972
dfeik33@comcast.net
Now that we have released these reports and pending permits into the ethos, let’s see who else jumps in to cover this big breaking development.ย This is a very important and substantial turn in the road for us all.ย Intel is fighting back and refuting things through their lawyers.ย Maybe some compliance and real commitment would be a good idea too.
These are my opinions; the facts in reports are on record and cannot be imagined.ย This is real.



















My friend, the late Sharon Cornish, would certainly attest to this “Scathing EPA Inspection Report On Intel In Hillsboro”. She predicted this twenty years ago when she was stricken with an “environmental” type of cancer.
Sharon always knew Intel would be detrimental to our health in Hillsboro and surrounding communities. She knew that the City of Hillsboro was most complicit with this.
What I find very ironic is this….The DEQ facility which confirms that a VERY SMALL number of vehicles are non-compliant AND is less than a mile away, as the crow flies, from the pollution cited in this expose`. Why are they even necessary. It all about REVENUE! It’s all about GREED!
Citizens be damned…..Go to a Hops game and breathe in the fresh air.
Great report, sorry Intel don’t care about air pollution
Intel in New Mexico operates under a sham permit and it looks like Oregon has the same issue. You can read all about it in my book “Boiling Frogs, Intel vs. The Village” available from amazon.
Why don’t you move?
Hi John-
Well, what does me moving have anything to do with Intel obeying the law and not destroying my home of 60 years? But then again, this is exactly the response I expect from a company man.
Didn’t you have a nice 23 year career there in the Big I ?
Are you suggesting they have done nothing wrong and that there is no reason they should be held to the standard of the law?
Wow… thanks for the thoughtful comment. Since I was here first by about 30 years, maybe I am not the one that should be moving. Just a thought.
Thanks for playing!
With regards to practical enforcement, page 18 explains that limits on pollution volumes are not enforceable without the ability to regulate “operation hours and production rates.” This is definitely an area for greater transparency, but given the confidential nature of a portion of the work that goes on at Ronler specifically, you’re going to run into problems with some of the data. Additionally, the EPA’s calculated values for all emissions, including the boiler/heater corrections, were within regulation standards as seen on page 21. The “close to limits” statement simply indicated that Intel should be mindful that their emissions are almost at the point that they will need to increase their source permit. As for the source level Intel Hillsboro should be at, the EPA should simply apply the standard limits for semiconductors as noted on page 18, with any changes necessary to be conducted after Intel gets their reporting act together. I don’t know why this isn’t already the case.
Great input and analysis. Thank you for contributing to the conversation.
I work at all 4 campuses. I’m not a “blue badge”full on Intel employee, but a “green badge” “contingent worker”, a k.a. a contractor. I have done extensive work in the ‘behind the scenes’ areas, and have been – formerly – extremely impressed, as someone who understands mechanical and electrical systems very well.
The systems they have in place to mitigate environmental pollution are, or were at the time of installation, the top of the line technologies for that particular type of hazard. The problem that I’ve been seeing is that in some instances, they have waited for too long between updates/upgrades/general maintenance to their systems, and not they’re not putting forth the money in form of actual projects, to make sure that their contractors have the staff to address these issues. My company has had to lay off a number of staff (some who have worked there for decades!) in the last 9 months, because Intel isn’t signing off on new projects at the moment.
After seeing these reports, I’m nervous to work at Ronler or Aloha, now, until I hear that the EPA is happy.
Thank you, Johnny, for your analysis. We want to hear from people like you who work behind Mr Wonka’s wall. So it sounds like you feel they do a great job, but that things need to be handled better in terms of maintenance and upkeep. That would support other comments we have heard.
Thank you for your honest input. Please keep conttibuting as you are able.
Dirk
There would be no hillsboro without Intel. You should find something better to do with your time. Trump in 2024.
Hello Robert,
How nice to hear from another Intel employee. I am sure you see things this way. That is part of your problem. Hillsboro was far more livable and wonderful before the company came. Let me assure of that, it was. But you would not know that so your perspective is not balanced nor correct. Because you are hiding behind a BS email address and won’t give your name, there is no way to take any of your comments seriously.
As to your closing comments, good luck with that one! This probably isn’t a place you live nor would be able to with that mindset. But I do wish you well with all of your pursuits and thank you for weighing in!
Hillsboro was there before Intel, and will be just fine without them. #$^K that lying POS Dumpster. You’re a fool for falling for his lies, and morally corrupt for supporting such a s-bag.
Trump in jail 2024
Should this be protested?
My wife and I would love to help make a difference in fighting against awful things like this.
Please, whatever we can do, let us know!
Josh –
Well, there are a few people working on this. I think raching out to the EPA is a good idea. The DEQ is not doing anything. The EPA report is in the article. I think there will be some bigger discussions around all of this. Thank you for caring and weighing in! I will let you know what else I hear.
OK, I looked it over, and Intel’s Air Permit Attorney’s reply (concerning the head engineer didn’t reply–but required an attorneys phrasing! Never encouraging or transparent in my opinion). Also read other comments above–helpful (well most :-), as I am Not an Engineer! I also noted your concerns in my reading, and agree. I am wondering if the additional data–promised by mid Nov 2023 ever came about? There seemed to be debate in the response letter about that: “reside in databases that cannot be transferred. These databases contain some of Intelโs most proprietary information.”
And This concerned me in the response letter:
“Intel recognizes the unique nature of the Plant Site Emission Limit (โPSELโ) program in Oregon and how it differs from permitting, including implementation of practical enforceability, that occurs in other states. As EPA noted in a prior assessment of the Oregon PSEL and New Source Review rules โit is important to recognize that the Oregon rules do not mimic the EPA regulations nor, in many ways, do they even remotely resemble them.โ We believe that several of the observations in the Report stem from a lack of familiarity with the
unique characteristics of Oregonโs PSEL program and welcome the opportunity to provide additional background information.”
Nice way to tell the NEIC they don’t know what they are talking about in Oregon. So, what is the difference between what other states require–now I am wondering–doesn’t sound good.
As far as being “close to the major source threshold”–we know they have been approved for basically double the emissions–sounds like if they do indeed increase, potentially even quite a bit less than double–they will be over threshold. Now good questions remain–will Intel give data/accurate data on ongoing measurements–will measurements be taken frequently–will there be good oversight???
Charolyn,
Essentially the EPA has no teeth and Intel knows it. I have experienced this first hand on another contamination site. The lack of EPAโs enforcement coupled with Bidenโs CHPS Act money and Kotexโs โshovel readyโmoney has sent the signal to Intel that they have carte blanch. Remember too that Trump took away the protections of water ways and wetlands. Those have not been restored. Trump has also threatened to dissolve the EPA.
I consulted with a friend who doesnโt want to be named in Sacramento who was astonished that Intelโs application for Ronler Acres didnโt have Title V on it. Especially since Intel is the biggest polluter in Oregon. I commented on that application but I didnโt mention Title V. Then a week later the DEQ information officer approving the permit emailed me about my questions about Intel Title V designation. I never mentioned that. So there may be some behind the scenes with regards to Intelโs designation.
These are the sort of comments that further the discussion. Thank you, Amanda for this information.
Thanks–Amanda–I have noted all of your first paragraph points, and don’t doubt your conclusions. Sadly, seems the only area we have bipartisan agreement on! Really infuriates me every time I hear our politicians claiming to want to do something about global warming–what a crisis it is…Yet I know how much they turn a blind eye to Intel’s emissions!!! Even worse, actively support them. If only our farmers had the financial support our state is giving to the semiconductor and data farms :-(