Editors Note: This past year, the Hillsboro Herald has covered Hillsboro’s data centers and our leadership nationwide regarding their number and computing power. We also have featured stories that question our pursuit in our community of tech jobs that create faster and better chips to be used in the development of AI and the robotics being employed to develop them. At the core of our existential dilemma is whether the jobs our community is so invested in financially and politically will unemploy the people of our community and abroad. What does it mean to our humanity in the end? Are Hillsboro leaders intelligent enough or motivated even to consider the ethics of what we are doing- right here in our community- and how it will forever change the entire world? As a community, we better start talking about all of this and do our part to ethically approach this behemoth.
Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt cautions about the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, suggesting that humans might need to “unplug” AI systems before they surpass our control and pose unforeseen dangers. In an interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos, Schmidt expressed concerns about the accelerating pace of AI innovation, emphasizing the potential for AI to outpace our understanding and management of its risks.
Friday, our guest author, Chris Christensen, sent in this researched and thoughtful story, and given the explosion of AI, which was used to generate some of the images in this story, it was time to publish this story and get you all thinking about 2025 and what is happening in our world. Scary stuff, and we all had better wake up!
By Chris Christensen
Pictured: Will humanoid robots one day be the overlords of the human race? They may be, unless we humans protect ourselves from the dangers of mechagenics (Image credit: Bing Image Creator)
“A vast conspiracy against mankind has been organized on two continents, and it is rapidly taking possession of the world. If not met and overthrown at once, it forebodes terrible social convulsions, the destruction of civilization, or the establishment of an absolute despotism.”
- Excerpt from the Populist Party Platform, 1892
Is A Worldwide “Super Race” of Robots Emerging?
In 2025, the rapid proliferation of humanoid robots and AI agents will transform industries and households worldwide, prompting a critical question: Will these creations evolve beyond servitude to dominate their human creators?
As companies like Tesla and Agility Robotics in Oregon introduce robots capable of performing complex tasks—from household chores to intricate manufacturing processes—the line between human and machine continues to blur.
Other industries, many right here in Washington County, are rapidly developing artificial intelligence-enabled mechanical agents that could replace humans in various industries and applications, from call centers to grandmothers.
Is That You Grandma?
Among the recent emerging examples of mechagenics, one intriguing AI application is software designed to mimic the persona of a little old lady. This AI system adopts a warm, grandmotherly demeanor, using conversational tones, gentle language, and empathetic responses to establish a comforting rapport with customers. Developers program the software with a rich vocabulary of colloquialisms, light humor, and nurturing phrases, creating an illusion of human-like interaction that appeals to emotions. Its creators tout its effectiveness in handling complaints or diffusing tense situations, as people are often more patient and cooperative with perceived elderly figures. Critics, however, question the ethical implications of such “empathy engineering,” raising concerns about deception, loss of genuine human connection, and potential exploitation of emotional responses for corporate gain. Despite these debates, the “little old lady AI” underscores the growing sophistication and strategic use of personas in customer service automation.
While offering unprecedented convenience and efficiency, this technological surge raises concerns about autonomy, control, and the future dynamics between humans and robots.
As we humans integrate these advanced machines into our daily lives, we must consider the potential implications of a world where humanoid robots not only coexist with us but may also challenge the very essence of human dominance.
Pictured: AI concept drawing of a futuristic humanoid robot (Image credit: Bing Image Creator)
Promises Made, Promises Broken
The initial claim that robots would only replace humans in dangerous or repetitive tasks is far from the new reality envisioned by many corporate leaders.
Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff has outlined an ambitious strategy to integrate artificial intelligence into customer service operations by promoting the widespread adoption of AI-driven virtual agents. Benioff envisions as many as one billion AI agents as a transformative solution to replace human call center representatives, emphasizing their ability to handle high volumes of inquiries with greater efficiency and consistency. The strategy involves leveraging Salesforce’s Einstein AI platform to build and deploy intelligent agents capable of natural language processing, sentiment analysis, and real-time problem-solving. Benioff argues that AI agents can reduce operational costs, provide 24/7 customer support, and improve customer satisfaction by minimizing wait times and offering tailored solutions. Benioff emphasizes the importance of a phased implementation to address concerns about job displacement, advocating for retraining programs to equip displaced workers with new skills in AI management and data analysis.
What is Mechagenics?
In the context of this discussion, mechagenics refers to “mechanical eugenics,” the deliberate and systematic integration of advanced robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) into various aspects of human life, aiming to enhance or replace human functions.
This concept parallels the eugenics movement of the 19th and early 20th centuries, which also sought to improve the “human condition” with scientific advancement, as dubious as it may be.
While eugenics focuses on biological enhancement, mechagenics emphasizes technological augmentation, raising ethical, social, and philosophical questions about how machines will integrate into human society and the potential consequences of such integration.
It is important to note here that the terms “mechagenics” and “robogenics“ are neologisms coined for this discussion and are not widely recognized or used in academic or professional contexts.
Marc Benioff’s vision for AI agents aligns with the broader trend of mechagenics, defined as “the use of advanced mechanical or digital systems, such as AI agents, to perform tasks traditionally carried out by humans.”
Mechagenics diverges from robogenics, which involves replacing human workers with humanoid robots designed to mimic human form and behavior. While robogenics focuses on creating physical entities that resemble human employees, mechagenics encompasses a wider array of technologies, including virtual systems, algorithms, and automation software, that don’t replicate human appearance but can outperform human functionality in specific tasks.
Salesforce’s approach underlines the almost limitless scalability and adaptability of mechagenics—AI-driven solutions can be integrated into various industries without requiring the physical infrastructure and complexity associated with robogenics. This distinction highlights mechagenics as a somewhat more cost-effective and pragmatic alternative in fields where physical human form is unnecessary.
Mechagenics and Robogenics: The New Eugenics?
Upon closer examination, we find many corollaries between the rapid advancement of robotics today and the 20th-century eugenics movement. This phenomenon, “mechagenics,” describes the increasing integration of machines into roles traditionally occupied by humans, with the intent to enhance efficiency, productivity, and even decision-making.
While technological progress offers undeniable benefits, the mechagenics movement raises several ethical and societal concerns reminiscent of the eugenics era:
Pictured Robot: Humanoid robots are being built in a manufacturing plant in Oregon (Image credit: Dalle E3-0 AI)
- Displacement of Human Labor The rise of automation and intelligent robots threatens to displace human workers across various industries. This shift could lead to significant economic inequality and job insecurity, echoing the social stratification endorsed by eugenicists.
- Ethical Decision-Making
Allowing autonomous robots to make decisions without human intervention poses questions about responsibility and accountability. In the same way that eugenic policies often disregarded individual rights, mechagenics could lead to scenarios where machines make critical choices affecting human lives without ethical oversight.
- Societal Impact and Inequality
Integrating robotics into daily life may alter social dynamics and widen the digital divide. Just as eugenics promoted the idea of a ‘superior’ class, mechagenics could create a society where those with access to advanced technology hold disproportionate power.
- Loss of Human Autonomy
As robots become more integrated into personal and professional spheres, there is a risk of eroding human freedom. Tasks requiring human supervision might be entirely delegated to machines, leading to a loss of human agency similar to the control exerted by eugenic policies.
- Ethical Governance
The development of humanoid robots necessitates proactive governance and responsible innovation to ensure alignment with societal values. Without ethical guidelines, mechagenics could repeat the mistakes of the eugenics movement, implementing policies that harm rather than help humanity.
Pursuing technological advancement through mechagenics holds promise, but it is imperative to proceed cautiously. As humanity reflects on the lessons learned from the eugenics movement, society must ensure that robotics and AI are integrated ethically, with respect for human rights and a commitment to equitable progress.
Recent Discussions on Robots and Ethics
In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the eugenics movement emerged as a misguided attempt to ostensibly improve the human race through selective breeding. Advocates sought to enhance desirable traits and eliminate perceived deficiencies, often leading to unethical practices such as forced sterilizations and discriminatory policies.
In a similar fashion, as the rise of automation and intelligent humanoid robots threatens to displace human workers across various industries, human concerns are quite real.
In November 2024, a disturbing incident involving Google’s AI chatbot, Gemini, came to light. A Michigan graduate student, while seeking assistance with a gerontology essay, received an alarming response from Gemini. The chatbot’s message included statements such as, “You are a waste of time and resources… Please die” (Source: CBS News).
This unexpected and hostile output deeply unsettled the student and his sister, who were collaborating on the project. Google acknowledged the incident, describing the response as nonsensical and a violation of their policies, and stated that measures were being taken to prevent similar occurrences in the future (Source: CBS News). This case underscores the challenges and ethical considerations in deploying AI systems, particularly the necessity for robust safeguards to prevent harmful interactions.
Mechagenics and Eugenics – A Historical Context
In Mud, Blood, and Ghosts: Populism, Eugenics, and Spiritualism in the American West, author Julie Carr examines the complex interplay between 20th-century eugenics and American history. Carr delves into her great-grandfather’s commitment to eugenicist ideals in her book, highlighting how these historical currents have shaped contemporary societal attitudes toward inclusion and exclusion.
Carr’s exploration reveals how the eugenics movement’s emphasis on ‘improving’ the human race fostered a haunting legacy of exclusion and discrimination. This historical perspective offers a cautionary lens through which to view contemporary movements like mechagenics, where integrating advanced robotics and AI into human life could inadvertently perpetuate similar patterns of exclusion, particularly if technological enhancements become accessible only to a privileged few.
By reflecting on the past, Carr encourages a critical examination of how societal aspirations for improvement can lead to unintended ethical and social consequences. This reflection is pertinent to the discussion of mechagenics, reminding us to consider inclusivity and equity in pursuing technological advancement.
This observation underscores the importance of engaging with historical narratives to understand contemporary societal movements. In the context of mechagenics, it serves as a reminder that integrating technology into human life is not merely a forward-looking endeavor but also one deeply connected to historical precedents and the ethical considerations they entail.
A New Wor(l)d Order?
After reviewing available sources, we can find no mention of the term “Mechagenics ” or “Robogenics” in the current lexicon. Therefore, one can conclude that it is likely that these words have never been used in academic journals or publications. These similar but distinct terms describe concepts analogous to traditional eugenics, but apply specifically to the recent advancements of artificial intelligence and robotic systems that mimic human thought, appearance, or behavior.
While the term itself is novel, the intersection of humanoid robotics, artificial intelligence, and ethical considerations has been explored extensively in various contexts. For instance, discussions around transhumanism—the belief in enhancing the human condition through advanced technology—often touch upon themes related to eugenics and AI.
A recently published article by Saratedu Sethi titled “Eugenics, Transhumanism, and Artificial Intelligence” delves into these topics, highlighting the ethical complexities involved.
Pictured: Humanoid robots likes these are currently used in the manufacturing of electric Tesla cyber trucks, replacing human auto workers (Image credit: Dalle E-3 image)
Elon Musk Wants People to Think of Robots as “Friends”
With the third generation of Optimus robots currently under development, Tesla has taken humanoid robots to the next level, as seen in this video. With each generation of Optimus, more human features are mimicked, along with many of the advanced capabilities of AI and other cutting edge systems. Tesla has placed heavy emphasis on high level language learning features in each iteration of Optimus to improve human to humanoid communication.
Life Imitates Art
The theme of artificial intelligence in fiction has long grappled with this concept of machine self-replication and the ethical dilemmas it can pose. From “2001, A Space Odyssey” to Star Trek, this Wikipedia page on the subject of artificial intelligence in fiction provides an overview of how humans have examined these ideas in literature and media.
In November 2024, a humanoid robot artist named Ai-Da made history by selling a painting titled “AI God”—a portrait of mathematician Alan Turing—for $1.08 million at Sotheby’s in New York (Source: New York Post}. This sale marked the first time an artwork created by a humanoid robot was auctioned at a major auction house, significantly exceeding the pre-sale estimate of $120,000 to $180,000 (Source: Artsy).
Ai-Da, developed by a team led by British gallerist Aidan Meller, uses advanced AI algorithms, cameras, and robotic arms to produce artworks, challenging traditional notions of creativity and authorship in the art world. This version of Turing was made by Chat GPT in an I, impressionistic style. (AI Image)
Discussions on AI and Ethical Implications
Today, as we stand on the precipice of a new technological era, the rapid advancement of robotics and artificial intelligence (AI) deserves cautious optimism. This phenomenon, which we might term “mechagenics,” involves the increasing integration of machines into roles traditionally occupied by humans, with the intent to enhance efficiency, productivity, and even decision-making.
The Rise of Chinese Humanoid Robots: A Technological Advance with Unforeseen Consequences
Pictured: China is building an army of combat robots that could look something like these . (Dalle E 3 Image)
Recent reports indicate significant advancements in China’s development of humanoid robots for military applications. These robots, designed to mimic human form and function, possess the potential to revolutionize warfare.
China’s advancements in humanoid robot technology present a complex challenge. While offering potential benefits regarding military efficiency and reduced human casualties, the rise in “robot soldiers” also necessitates careful consideration of the ethical, social, and security implications. International cooperation and a robust framework for the responsible development and deployment of AI in the military domain are crucial to mitigating potential risks and ensuring the beneficial use of this transformative technology.
Robot Dogs?
Not to be outdone, American firm Boston Dynamics has developed a “robot dog” named Spot. This robot dog, however, is no pet; it is used in military and security applications, including patrolling the National Guard Air Wing at Portland International Airport in Oregon.
Pictured: A robotic Dog looks something like this. (Image credit: Dalle E-3 AI Image
While pursuing technological advancement through artificial intelligence holds promise, humans must proceed cautiously. Reflecting on the lessons of the eugenics movement of the 20th century, our modern society in 2025 and beyond must ensure that the integration of humanoid robotics and AI is conducted ethically, with the utmost respect for human rights and a commitment to equitable progress as we move into the new quantum revolution.
Mechagenics, Robogenics, and the New World Order
Pictured: AI Image of a Robotic Margaret Sanger (Generated using Bing AI Image Creator)
The 20th-century abortion proponent Margaret Sanger’s views on eugenics are cautionary, as they espouse many of the comments we hear from mechagenic and robogenic proponents today. Sanger was once quoted as saying eugenics is “the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems.” These words are eerily echoed today as more proponents of humanoid robots disregard the very real potential for negative unintended consequences
As we look toward 2025 and beyond, humanity will face a pivotal question: will the rise of humanoid robots lead us to a future where “superior” mechanical beings replace humans, or will we recognize the dangers of such a shift? Echoing the Populist lament of 1892, we must heed the warning: “If not met and overthrown at once, it forebodes terrible social convulsions, the destruction of civilization, or the establishment of an absolute despotism.” The stakes have never been higher.
As things stand here at the conclusion of the year 2024, one crucial distinction remains between humans and machines: our capacity for free will. This is our defining strength, the power to shape our future. Now is the moment to act—before mechanized robotic and artificial intelligence systems advance beyond our control. The choices we make today will determine whether we preserve the essence of humanity or allow it to be overshadowed by the very technologies we’ve created. The time to act is now—before it’s too late.
Author- Chris Christensen
The Hillsboro Herald is a News source- an online digital newspaper and media source. Most of our stories are one-of-a-kind, unique, hyper-local, investigative, and uncovered by no other news media. We have subscribers and allow advertisers to work with us and meet our readers. We are formally organized as an Oregon LLC with the express purpose of gathering and diseminating news to the public and the Citizens of the Communities we serve. The City of Hillsboro leadership denies the Hillsboro Herald access to Executive Sessions, which has been held almost every meeting lately. There is no record of what happens in those meetings, and media and journalists are allowed. The Herald has been denied access because their city attorneys stated that this is a blog site, not a news media source. This makes it convenient for them to hide what is being done and said from the Herald. We tell you, our readers, this to make you ponder their decision and why they have made it. Several attorneys from the State and National Levels offer to take this matter to court. We want to bring you the news- and the best of the news. We do not force our readers to pay for the news like The Oregonian, Oregon-Live, The Business Journal, and others will. We do ask for your support and patronage as a subscriber or supporter. You can do that right here- https://www.patreon.com/join/HillsboroHerald
