Community rifts in North Plains have escalated to a fever pitch as the city grapples with a proposed urban growth boundary expansion. The Aug. 5 city council meeting was a microcosm of the deep divisions that have fractured the once-quiet town.ย In a long meeting, many expressed their deepest concerns and feelings about this battle over growth, which has been pushed onto the residents for the past year or more.ย It ended, so it seemed, with citizens rejecting the massive 855-acre expansion, with 72% of voters saying a defiant NO to North Plains Mayor Teri Lenahan and her Council.ย After the drubbing at the ballot boxes, it seemed the Mayor wanted to take some time and lower the residents’ temperature by listening and returning to the drawing board.
The vote to stop the growth plans approved by the Mayor and Council was in late May.ย On June 5th, Mayor Lenahan told the Hillsboro News-Times, โWe are very early in assessing next steps for a future UGB expansion area,โ Lenahan said. โWe look forward to working together with the community with positivity and respect to make North Plains the strongest and best community it can be.โ https://www.hillsboronewstimes.com/news/north-plains-plans-in-limbo-following-urban-growth-boundary-rejection/article_7ddd9d8e-2396-11ef-b67b-eb333e2e1455.html
Well, that statement did not age well. The Council is already rushing to assemble a Project Advisory Committee and has set many rules in meetings and other discussions. While councilors initially planned to vote on the next steps at the meeting, the decision has been postponed until Sept. 3.
The city is forming a Project Advisory Committee to gather diverse input. This committee will include six North Plains residents representing various perspectives on the previous expansion proposal and two residents from neighboring unincorporated Washington County. Applications to join the committee are open until Aug. 26.
โThe (committee) should be a body that advises the board and not a body that’s made primarily of those already in the city government; at least half the members should be drawn in as diverse a way as possible from the community,โ Nichols said .ย He also urged the City to take their time on this issue of growth and let the Advisory group have time to her from everyone.ย That does not appear to be in the plans as the City seems to be pushing for a decision on the growth matter by the end of 2024.
There was some excellent testimony, which can be seen and heard in the YouTube video of this Council meeting. For the most part, people kept their composure.ย Not, however, former North Plains Mayor Cynthia Hirst, who came in like General Patton to support the City and scold those who voted NO and dared to speak up during this process.
โI want to thank all of you council members for all of the stuff that you’ve had to deal with in the last year.ย You all know what I am talking about,” said Hirst.ย Then, in a series of sentences, she lit up people involved in the process and complained about the “nasty phrases” people were using.ย She went on for a few sentences exalting the City Staff and Council for putting in “1000s of hours” on the growth topic.ย She then turned to the crowd, made eye contact with some of them, and scolded them.
“Where have you been the last ten years?”
“Farming,” said one respondent.
Barely flinching, Hirst continued in her terse, almost mean testimony.ย You can see it right here and in the Video above.
This sort of thing, this arrogance that she has shown, as well as Lenahan and members of the Council, is typical of where we are as suburban and rural communities.ย Cities hold closed executive sessions to discuss growth strategies, legal cases, etc.ย They don’t engage at any real grassroots house-to-house level.ย Very few actual town hall Q and A sessions.ย They get caught in an echo chamber and ultimately become tone-deaf.ย What comes across as indifference might more likely be the inability to appreciate that people outside the bubble don’t know or connect because no one has done that with them.ย In this case, Hirst is full of it.
North Plains residents rejected Urban Growth expansions before and fought over the last expansion many years ago.ย These last few years, the City has talked around this issue, and three or four areas were consistently discussed as possibilities.ย However, it was not until 2023 that a map of the 855-acre expansion was shown; the plan effectively doubled the town’s size and proposed industrial zoning next to new homes and schools.ย The people of North Plains are smart- they are trusting.ย But that trust and their goodwill to try and go along and get along is gone for now.
Hirst came across as nasty and disengaged, perhaps living on the laurels of the past. All she did was add razor wire to the barbwire fence that has already been erected between City Hall and the pro-growth side and the 72% of the citizens of North Plains who expect something better. She should have been corrected or calmed down by Lenahan, but the Mayor sat in silence and watchedโperhaps gleefullyโI know not.
Let’s not forget that Lenahan and the Council were on record as saying they had to push this growth through because it was required by State Law.ย Others who understand land use laws, including me, knew that was untrue.ย So the Herald contacted the (DLCD ) Department of Land Conservation and Development to confirm what we already knew.ย The question was, do cities like North Plains have to grow – is it a State Law like Mayor Lenahan has stated?ย Answer – No, it is not!
โA city with a population below 10,000 outside of Portland Metro is not required to update their comprehensive plan, housing needs analysis, or economic opportunity analysis on a regular schedule. Citiesย with populations above 10,000ย outside of Portland Metro need to update every 8 years, but cities below 10,000 are not obliged to update those plans โ it is voluntary. This is due to HB 2003 of 2019. For confirmation, see that North Plains is not listed on the Housing Capacity Analysis Update Schedule for Oregon Cities attachment toย OAR 660-008-0045 โ Director – DLCD
These personal attacks and accusations have become commonplace as tensions rise. Mayor Lenahan’s complaints about the harassment she has received highlight the toxic atmosphere that has permeated the community. Let’s not forget that we tend to reap what we sew.
Meanwhile, some critics accuse city leaders of being out of touch with the desires of ordinary residents.
โOne of the major concerns that we’ve had is the apparent self-dealing if you will, and maybe just the appearance of it,” stated resident Jeremy Anderson. He went on to say that as a resident, he wants to suggest that none of the large landowners who stand to make huge profits should be allowed on the Committee. He is right. Those lands must come in because they have merit and make smart additions to the City. Period.
What will happen next?ย Well, for one, elections are happening.ย It is a good bet that the November elections will generate some new Councilors, and when that happens, these growth plans, which are not wanted, not required, and not needed, may be called off altogether.
North Plains is a battlefield- and people like Hirst and Lenahan need to bring their A games and not these tactics if they want their side to win.



















Would someone be willing to explain to me why NP isn’t part of the UGB? I feel like it should be, it’s basically part of our metro area. Otherwise, what’s the point of the UGB if towns just outside of the UGB like NP are just going to sprawl?
From what I understand the UGB isn’t perfect, but the point is to encourage infill unless adding land will create jobs or serve some other specific need. I feel like that structure could help sort out this issue between NP officials and it’s residents.
There’s gotta be some common ground here, right???
Hi George –
North Plains, like all of Oregon’s cities, has an Urban Growth Boundary. Each town and City has its own boundaries. The State of Oregon reviewes and approves them based on various factors. The Housing Needs Analysis, or HNA, helps guide cities what their needs are and also to establish when a UGB needs to move. METRO is a super regioal government agency that directs growth within parts of the 3 counties and helps to guide growth in each area and the whole in a coordinated way. METRO does not have jusirdcition over North Plains and Banks.
The common ground you seek is what the Friends of North Plains Smart Growth are working towards. So far, the Mayor and the Council, have wanted an all or nothing strategy. I am hearing the the residents and groups discuss about 1/3rd or so of the proposed growth as being sufficient- and that additional growth could come after this next bacth of new land is properly absorbed. More land is not a good strategy unless it is well done. What is being proposed is not better. So the UGB is needed- every town in Oregon needs and has one. Growing North Plains is not a requirement- not a State law as Mayor Lenahan has testified to. METRO would never allow that much growth at one time. No way! So the door is open to the pro-growth side to meet the smart growth folks in the middle. I od not see that happening easily- but it should be a no brainer!
George, either you donโt understand whatโs going on, or youโre using the wrong terminology. I canโt even begin to try and unravel your comment. I assume youโre asking something about north plains needing to be part of the rotten bureaucracy known as metro?